Aarushi-Hemraj double murder case: In the wake of film, book, CBI publishes court orders on website


After a book and film made on the Aarushi Talwar murder case seemed sympathetic to his convicted parents, the CBI posted court orders related to the case on its website.

In an official response, Central Investigation Bureau (CBI) spokesperson Devpreet Singh said, “The Aarushi-Hemraj murder case is being discussed in the public domain. To facilitate the general public, CBI has placed all important court decisions on its website cbi.nic.in.


While the CBI was officially tight-lipped about the book and film’s release, senior officials said the judgments and orders from various courts were self-explanatory.

The special court in Ghaziabad convicted dentist couple Rajesh and Nupur Talwar in the murder of Aarushi and their domestic helper Hemraj.

The 210-page comprehensive order from then-special judge Shyam Lal entered defense arguments as well as prosecutions for almost a year before the dentist couple were given life sentences for them. crimes.

The CBI started from the start of the case and uploaded all the orders, including the knowledge order from the CBI special court in Ghaziabad and the final sentencing order from the sessions court.

The subsequent bail application filed by the two defendants and the Allahabad High Court order were also uploaded.

Lal had said in his judgment that there was no evidence of any entry into Talwars’ residence in Jalvayu Vihar Noida on the night of May 15-16, 2008, when Aarushi and Hemraj, 14, were killed. in the flat.

Recently, the Hindi book and film have given rise to a debate on the case as both weigh in favor of the Talwar, while the case is pending in the High Court of Allahabad.

The Talwars have missed four court dates claiming their lawyers are busy at the Supreme Court.

After it was reported that the Supreme Court was on recess on the dates cited by Talwars, the High Court asked them to file an affidavit giving details of the dates and cases in which their lawyers were busy.

In his detailed judgment, Lal cited 26 reasons the dentist couple were convicted and sentenced them to life imprisonment.

“From the evidence presented by the prosecution in the form of oral and documentary evidence, this tribunal succeeds in
to the overwhelming and compelling conclusion that only the accused are responsible for committing this
horrible crime because the following circumstances inevitably point to the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused ”, the
order says.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.