The differences between “Rent Live” and the film that Fox kept with the stage version
Mark, Roger, Mimi, Tom, Angel, Maureen, Joanne and even Benny have been beloved characters for over 20 decades. But if you first met them in the adaptation of Christopher Columbus in 2005, you’ll immediately notice some differences between Rent: Live and the movie. These changes won’t come as much of a surprise to fans of the original Broadway musical, as they have had years to lament or accept the liberties the film took with Jonathan Larson’s musical.
The original Broadway production of To rent was critically acclaimed and won the Tony for Best Musical in 1996, but the same really can’t be said for the film. Critics of critics weren’t overly kind, with To rent holding a score of 46% on Rotten Tomatoes. And the movie divided fans too – and not just because of the changes between them. The Columbus movie used the majority of the original Broadway cast and while some people may have liked it, others thought these actors were too old to reprise their roles nine years later.
Yet if you had never had the opportunity to see To rent Live on stage, the film has introduced you to this world of artists who struggle to pay their rent in Alphabet City and live with HIV / AIDS. So to see where these adaptations stand, here are the differences between To rent the movie and Rent: Live.